Puzzle Paradox
Larry Becker and Lee Earle
(Based on 1 review)
The performer shakes the pieces inside the box, then opens it for everyone to see the assortment of pieces inside. "Each of you take one piece, please," he offers to three nearby participants, "and do your best to memorize its unique shape."
Taking another piece from the box and handing it to the first participant for comparison, the performer instructs. "Cup them in your hands and mix them. It will still be simple to pick out your piece because there are but two choices." He retrieves them from the helper and tosses them back into the box.
Approaching the next person, the mentalist withdraws three or four more pieces from the box and hands them to that helper, saying, "Now you try it. It gets tougher with more pieces, yes? Although I suppose with fewer than half a dozen different shapes, it's still fairly easy." Those pieces are also returned to the box.
For the third helper the performer says, "Toss your piece back into the box." He gives the pieces a shake and holds the lidless box for the participant to view the contents, "Your challenge is more complex; with a 250 piece puzzle, the odds against you finding your piece on the first try are 249 to 1."
"Unless," reminds the performer, "you have assembled that puzzle so many times it's burned into memory, as I have with this one." He places the lid on the box, hands it to helper #3 and instructs, "Give the pieces a good shaking, please, then lift the lid just enough to take just one hidden in your hand. Don't take a right angle corner piece - there are only four of them. Find an inside piece with no straight sides; there are more of those."
When the piece has been removed the performer sets the box aside and says, "When I'm ready, hold up that piece, with the back side toward me, as I count to three. Understood? (Yes.) Go! One..two..three. Got it!"
The performer picks up the assembled puzzle, moves his finger back and forth just above the surface as he views the shapes, stops over one of them, pries it from the puzzle, and says. "This is it. I'm positive."
"If you just compared the pieces," instructs the Meutalist. "not everyone could see the result. Instead, try your piece for fit where I made the hole." The selected puzzle piece slips easily into place - a perfect match!
Here are the details that will drive you nuts: The puzzle box and frame are totally ungimmicked. There are no switches. Every piece taken is freely selected. When the participants compare their pieces there is no question that each is a truly different shape. You employ no sleights or moves and no memorization is needed. Nothing else is used, added, or taken away (ie: no plastic baggies, ugh!). You get both custom made puzzles (one is fully assembled in the frame and the other is in the box) plus complete presentation instructions.
Puzzle Paradox is as clean as clean can be from the guys who originated the concept.
Reviews
(Top ▲)
Puzzle Paradox by Larry Becker and Lee Earl is a variation on the missing puzzle piece problem. This has been explored by other magicians and indeed has some controversy connected to it. The puzzle is 11x14 inches. The puzzle design is a little dark for my tastes and the size makes it not great for stand up but usable. The puzzle that is displayed for the audience to see is held in a cheap and tacky frame. If you were to purchase this effect it would be best to switch this for something a little more aesthetically pleasing.
The premise that Larry and Lee explore is a little different than the usual fair associated to the puzzle problem. In their version a piece is selected from a matching puzzle box. It is held up with the only the blank bottom side facing the performer. The performer then using his mental powers will select the matching piece from a fully assemble puzzle in a frame.
As usual Larry and Lee give you a full working script. This is one of the few times I am not overly excited by their script. Perhaps because there is not real reason to perform this effect other than watch me match your piece.
The puzzle piece problem has been with mentalism for a few decades now. I think the real challenge is finding an interesting presentation for this premise. Becker and Earl have put an interesting twist on it and you will receive a solid working effect. What you do with it and how you find your performance in it will determine how well it will work.
The premise that Larry and Lee explore is a little different than the usual fair associated to the puzzle problem. In their version a piece is selected from a matching puzzle box. It is held up with the only the blank bottom side facing the performer. The performer then using his mental powers will select the matching piece from a fully assemble puzzle in a frame.
As usual Larry and Lee give you a full working script. This is one of the few times I am not overly excited by their script. Perhaps because there is not real reason to perform this effect other than watch me match your piece.
The puzzle piece problem has been with mentalism for a few decades now. I think the real challenge is finding an interesting presentation for this premise. Becker and Earl have put an interesting twist on it and you will receive a solid working effect. What you do with it and how you find your performance in it will determine how well it will work.